User's Manual

Table Of Contents
Act of 1988 (HAC Act) to require digital wireless phones be compatible with hearing-aids. The
intent of the HAC Act is to ensure reasonable access to telecommunications services for persons
with hearing disabilities. While some wireless phones are used near some hearing devices (hearing
aids and cochlear
implants), users may detect a buzzing, humming, or whining noise. Some hearing devices are
more immune than others to this interference noise, and phones also vary in the amount of
interference they generate. The wireless telephone industry has
developed a rating system for wireless phones, to assist hearing device users find phones that may
be compatible with their hearing devices. Not all phones have been rated. Phones that are rated
have the rating on their box or a label located on the box.
The ratings are not guarantees. Results will vary depending on the user’s hearing
device and hearing loss. If your hearing device happens to be vulnerable to interference, you may
not be able to use a rated phone successfully. Trying out the phone with your hearing device is the
best way to evaluate it for your personal
needs.
M-Ratings: Phones rated M3 or M4 meet FCC requirements and are likely to generate less
interference to hearing devices than phones that are not rated. M4 is the better/higher of the two
ratings. R620 is rated M3.
T-Ratings: Phones rated T3 or T4 meet FCC requirements and are likely to be more usable with a
hearing aid’s telecoil than phones that are not rated. T4 is the better/higher of the two ratings.
R620 is rated T3.
Please power off the Bluetooth function while using hearing aid devices with your PB65100.
Hearing devices may also be rated.
Your hearing device manufacturer or hearing health professional may help you find this rating.
Higher ratings mean that the hearing device is relatively immune to
Interference noise.
14 Safety and regulatory guide
The hearing aid and wireless phone rating values are then added together. A sum of 5 is considered
acceptable for normal use. A sum of 6 is considered for better use. A sum of 8 is considered for
best use. In the above example, if a hearing aid meets the M2 level rating and the wireless phone
meets the M3 level rating, the sum of the two values equal M5. This should provide the hearing
aid user with “normal usage” while using their hearing aid with the particular wireless phone.
“Normal usage” in this context is defined as a signal quality that is acceptable for normal
operation. This methodology applies equally for T ratings. The M mark is intended to be
synonymous with the U mark. The T mark is intended to be synonymous with the UT mark. The
M and T marks are recommended
by the Alliance for Telecommunications
Industries Solutions (ATIS). The U and UT marks are referenced in Section 20.19 of the FCC
Rules. The HAC rating and measurement procedure are described in the American National
Standards Institute (ANSI) C63.19 standard.
For information about hearing aids and digital wireless phones
FCC Hearing Aid Compatibility and Volume Control: