Datasheet



SLUS486B − AUGUST 2001 − REVISED JULY 2003
7
www.ti.com
APPLICATION INFORMATION
A typical application circuit for systems with 8.5-V to 20-V input is shown in Figure 3.
C
IN
C2
R1
C1
PWM
Input
D1
GND
VIN
VHI
G1
SW
SWS
PVLO
N/C
VDD
VLO
G2S
G2
PGND
AGND
IN
N/C
UCC27222
L1
Cout
Q1
Q2
V
OUT
GND
Figure 3. System Application: 8.5-V to 20-V Input
selection of VHI series resistor R1 (dV/dt Considerations):
The series resistor R1 may be needed to slowdown the turn-on of the main forward switch to limit the dV/dt which
can inadvertently turn on the synchronous rectifier switch. In nominal 12-V input designs, a R1 value of 4- to
10- can be used depending on the type of MOSFET used and the high-side/low-side MOSFET ratio. In 5-V
or lower input applications however, R1 is not needed.
When the drain-source voltage of a MOSFET quickly rises, inadvertent dV/dt induced turn-on of the device is
possible. This can especially be a problem for input voltages of 12 V or greater. As Q1 rapidly turns on, the
drain-to-source voltage of Q2 rises sharply, resulting in a dV/dt voltage spike appearing on the gate signal of
Q2. If the dV/dt induced voltage spike were to exceed the given threshold voltage, the MOSFET may briefly
turn on when it should otherwise be commanded off. Obviously this undesired event would have a negative
impact on overall efficiency.
Minimizing the dV/dt effect on Q2 can be accomplished by proper MOSFET selection and careful layout
techniques. The details of how to select a MOSFET to minimize dV/dt susceptibility are outlined in SEM−1400,
Topic 2, Appendix A, Section A5. Secondly, the switch node connecting Q1, Q2 and L1 should be laid out as
tight as possible, minimizing any parasitic inductance, which might worsen the dV/dt problem.
If the dV/dt induced voltage spike is still present on the gate Q2, a 4W to 10W value of R1 is recommended to
minimize the possibility of inadvertently turning on Q2. The addition of R1 slows the turn-on of Q1, limiting the
dV/dt rate appearing on the drain-to-source of Q2. Slowing down the turn-on of Q1 will result in slightly higher
switching loss for that device only, but the efficiency gained by preventing dV/dt turn-on of Q2 will far outweigh
the negligible effect of adding R1.
When Q2 is optimally selected for dV/dt robustness and careful attention is paid to the PCB layout of the switch
node, R1 may not be needed at all, and can therefore be replaced with a 0- jumper to maintain high efficiency.
The goal of the designer should not be to completely eliminate the dV/dt turn-on spike but to assure that the
maximum amplitude is less than the MOSFET gate-to-source turn-on threshold voltage under all operating
conditions.