Datasheet



SLOS238D − MAY 1999 − REVISED AUGUST 2008
www.ti.com
23
APPLICATION INFORMATION
GENERAL POWERPAD DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS (CONTINUED)
The next consideration is the package constraints. The two sources of heat within an amplifier are quiescent power and
output power. The designer should never forget about the quiescent heat generated within the device, especially devices
with multiple amplifiers. Because these devices have linear output stages (Class A-B), most of the heat dissipation is at
low output voltages with high output currents. Figure 54 to Figure 57 show this effect, along with the quiescent heat, with
an ambient air temperature of 50°C. Obviously, as the ambient temperature increases, the limit lines shown will drop
accordingly. The area under each respective limit line is considered the safe operating area. Any condition above this line
will exceed the amplifier’s limits and failure may result. When using V
CC
= ±5 V, there is generally not a heat problem, even
with SOIC packages. But, when using V
CC
= ±15 V, the SOIC package is severely limited in the amount of heat it can
dissipate. The other key factor when looking at these graphs is how the devices are mounted on the PCB. The PowerPAD
devices are extremely useful for heat dissipation. But, the device should always be soldered to a copper plane to fully use
the heat dissipation properties of the PowerPAD. The SOIC package, on the other hand, is highly dependent on how it
is mounted on the PCB. As more trace and copper area is placed around the device, θ
JA
decreases and the heat dissipation
capability increases. The currents and voltages shown in these graphs are for the total package. For the dual amplifier
package (THS4052), the sum of the RMS output currents and voltages should be used to choose the proper package. The
graphs shown assume that both amplifier outputs are identical.
Figure 54
Package With
θ
JA
< = 120°C/W
SO-8 Package
θ
JA
= 167°C/W
Low-K Test PCB
V
CC
= ± 5 V
T
j
= 150°C
T
A
= 50°C
100
80
40
0
012 3
− Maximum RMS Output Current − mA
140
180
200
45
160
120
60
20
| V
O
| − RMS Output Voltage − V
I
O
||
Maximum Output
Current Limit Line
THS4051
MAXIMUM RMS OUTPUT CURRENT
vs
RMS OUTPUT VOLTAGE DUE TO THERMAL LIMIT
S
Safe Operating
Area
Figure 55
100
10
0369
1000
12 15
Maximum Output
Current Limit Line
SO-8 Package
θ
JA
= 167°C/W
Low-K Test PCB
SO-8 Package
θ
JA
= 98°C/W
High-K Test PCB
T
J
= 150°C
T
A
= 50°C
| V
O
| − RMS Output Voltage − V
− Maximum RMS Output Current − mA
I
O
||
V
CC
= ± 15 V
DGN Package
θ
JA
= 58.4°C/W
THS4051
MAXIMUM RMS OUTPUT CURRENT
vs
RMS OUTPUT VOLTAGE DUE TO THERMAL LIMITS
Safe Operating
Area