MX-M503N/U/M453N/U/M363N/U/283N Sales-Guide GB
Table Of Contents
- Introduction
- Market Analysis
- Product Positioning
- Sales Approach
- Competitive Comparison
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Canon iR2025i
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Canon iR2030i
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Canon iR3225N
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Konica Minolta Bizhub 282
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Kyocera KM-2540
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Kyocera KM-2560
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Kyocera KM-3040
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Kyocera KM-3060
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 2510
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 3010
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 2550B
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 2550
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Canon iR3235
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Canon iR3235N
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Konica Minolta Bizhub 361
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Konica Minolta Bizhub 362
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Kyocera KM-4050
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 3350B
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 3350
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 3500
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Toshiba e-Studio 353
- Sharp MX-M453U & MX-M453N Vs. Canon iR3245
- Sharp MX-M453U & MX-M453N Vs. Canon iR3245N
- Sharp MX-M453U & MX-M453N Vs. Konica Minolta Bizhub 421
- Sharp MX-M453U & MX-M453N Vs. Kyocera KM-4050
- Sharp MX-M453U & MX-M453N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 4000B
- Sharp MX-M453U & MX-M453N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 4000
- Sharp MX-M453U & MX-M453N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 4500
- Sharp MX-M453U & MX-M453N Vs. Toshiba e-Studio 453
- Sharp MX-M503U & MX-M503N Vs. Konica Minolta Bizhub 501
- Sharp MX-M503U & MX-M503N Vs. Kyocera KM-5050
- Sharp MX-M503U & MX-M503N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 5000B
- Sharp MX-M503U & MX-M503N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 5000
- Features List
- Specifications
- Configurations
45
M
M
X
X
-
-
M
M
5
5
0
0
3
3
N
N
/
/
U
U
4
4
5
5
3
3
N
N
/
/
U
U
M
M
X
X
-
-
M
M
3
3
6
6
3
3
N
N
/
/
U
U
2
2
8
8
3
3
N
N
S
S
a
a
l
l
e
e
s
s
G
G
u
u
i
i
d
d
e
e
Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Kyocera KM-2540
Manufacturer SHARP Kyocera Manufacturer SHARP Kyocera
Model MX-M283N KM-2540 Model MX-M283N KM-2540
Launch Date June 2009 January 2008 Document Feeder Std Opt
Also Sold As N/A
Olivetti d-Copia 2500
Type RSPF RADF
Multifunctionality Std Opt Capacity 100 75
Network Printer Std Opt Network Printer Std Opt
Network Scanning Std No Print/min. (ppm) 28 25
Fax Opt Opt Print Resolution 1200x1200dpi 1200dpi
Base Engine Desktop Desktop Confidential Print Std Std
Paper Max. Size A3W A3 XPS Opt No
Total Cassettes Std. 2 2 Postscript Opt Std with print opt
Total Cassettes Max. 5 4 PCL 5e, 6 Std PCL 6 with print opt
Total Sheets Std. 1,100 1,200 Apple Opt Std with print opt
Max. Paper Sheets 5,600 2,200 Print Std. Mem. MB 1Gb 64mb
No of sheets (Bypass) 100 200 Print Max Mem. MB
2Gb 576mb
gsm - Tray (bypass) 209 (209) 120 (200) USB Std Std with print opt
Duplex (gsm) Std (209) Std Gigabit Ethernet Std No
Warm up time (secs) 20 15 Fax Opt Opt
Copier Std Std Super G3 Yes Yes
Copy/min. (cpm) 28 25 JBIG Compression Yes Yes
FCOT (secs) 4.6 4.7 i-Fax Opt Opt
Max. Original Size A3 A3 Network Scanning Std No
Max. Qty. Select 999 999 Type Colour N/A
Scanner Resolution 600x600 600x600 Resolution 600x600 N/A
Zoom Range 25-400% 25-400% Destinations
Desktop/FTP/email/
SMB/USB
N/A
Copier Std. Mem. MB 640mb 64mb Functionality Sharpdesk N/A
Copier Max. Mem. MB 640mb 192mb Document Filing Std No
HDD Std (80Gb) Opt (40Gb) Finishing Opt Opt
e-Sort Std Std Max Capacity (sheets)
4,000 500
Account Numbers 1,000 500 Auto Stapler Yes Yes
Machine Size (WxDxH) 645x695x953 570x640x767.2 Max Sheets Stapled 50 30
Job Programs 48 8 Offset Stacking Yes Yes
Advantages of Sharp MX-M283N Advantages of Kyocera KM-2540
• Faster output
• Scanning functionality
• Standard printing functionality
• Larger paper support
• More paper cassettes available
• Higher max paper capacity
• Heavier paper support (trays & bypass)
• Faster FCOT
• More print and copy memory
• Standard HDD (larger capacity than Kyocera option)
• More user accounts
• More job programs
• Standard document feeder
• Higher capacity document feeder
• XPS printing option
• Gigabit Ethernet
• Higher capacity finisher
• Can staple more sheets
• Higher std paper capacity (1200 sheets vs 1100)
• Higher capacity bypass tray (200 sheets vs 100)
• Faster warm-up time (15 sec. vs 20)
• Smaller footprint