Specifications
Table Of Contents
- Introduction
- Market Analysis
- Product Positioning
- Sales Approach
- Competitive Comparison
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Canon iR2025i
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Canon iR2030i
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Canon iR3225N
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Konica Minolta Bizhub 282
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Kyocera KM-2540
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Kyocera KM-2560
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Kyocera KM-3040
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Kyocera KM-3060
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 2510
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 3010
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 2550B
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 2550
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Canon iR3235
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Canon iR3235N
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Konica Minolta Bizhub 361
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Konica Minolta Bizhub 362
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Kyocera KM-4050
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 3350B
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 3350
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 3500
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Toshiba e-Studio 353
- Sharp MX-M453U & MX-M453N Vs. Canon iR3245
- Sharp MX-M453U & MX-M453N Vs. Canon iR3245N
- Sharp MX-M453U & MX-M453N Vs. Konica Minolta Bizhub 421
- Sharp MX-M453U & MX-M453N Vs. Kyocera KM-4050
- Sharp MX-M453U & MX-M453N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 4000B
- Sharp MX-M453U & MX-M453N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 4000
- Sharp MX-M453U & MX-M453N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 4500
- Sharp MX-M453U & MX-M453N Vs. Toshiba e-Studio 453
- Sharp MX-M503U & MX-M503N Vs. Konica Minolta Bizhub 501
- Sharp MX-M503U & MX-M503N Vs. Kyocera KM-5050
- Sharp MX-M503U & MX-M503N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 5000B
- Sharp MX-M503U & MX-M503N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 5000
- Features List
- Specifications
- Configurations
7
M
M
X
X
-
-
M
M
5
5
0
0
3
3
N
N
/
/
U
U
4
4
5
5
3
3
N
N
/
/
U
U
M
M
X
X
-
-
M
M
3
3
6
6
3
3
N
N
/
/
U
U
2
2
8
8
3
3
N
N
S
S
a
a
l
l
e
e
s
s
G
G
u
u
i
i
d
d
e
e
Whilst the overall picture shows a declining market, further analysis shows that the picture isn’t quite that simple.
The 21-30ppm market has begun to turn down since 2005, but the rate of decline has slowed dramatically to the
point that it appears to have hit a plateau.
The 41-50ppm segment has maintained a gradual decline, but the surprise is the 31-40ppm segment, which showed
a slight increase in unit sales in 2008.
No doubt this has a lot to do with falling prices and shrinking customer budgets, but this shows that there is still a
strong demand for workgroup and office – sized mono MFPs.
In fact the demand for this type of product is so strong that the decline in sales for this segment is less than the
decline of the overall mono MFP market.
% of the A3 Mono MFP market by segment
2004 FY 2005FY 2006FY 2007FY 2008FY
21-30 24.64% 26.72% 24.83% 24.47% 25.68%
31-40 11.71% 10.09% 10.35% 10.78% 12.65%
41-50 7.45% 6.95% 7.49% 7.53% 7.20%
21-50 combined 43.80% 43.76% 42.67% 42.79% 45.53%
Mono A3 MFP Market by Segment
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
2004 FY 2005FY 2006FY 2007FY 2008FY
BW 4: 21-30
BW 5: 31-40
BW 6: 41-50
BW 7: 51-60
BW 8: 61-80
BW 9: 81-90
BW 10: 91-180
(unit)