Comparison chart Xpressor 500 vs

Common ground
The xpressor and mpressor are both based on a fully discrete class-A topology which grants a generally
wide, open and transparent sound. Signal and transient projection are excellent, and both compressors
cause absolutely no degradation to signals passing their circuitry.
Both compressors are designed to be the opposite of a one trick pony. Flexibility has been one of the most
important design criteria in terms of well thought out feature sets as well as wide arrays of useful param-
eters instead of narrow sweet spots.
While each of these two processors will precisely control and beautifully enhance any signal sent through
them, they can both rely on individual strengths which echo in unique compression results:
xpressor 500
The xpressor 500 is a true feed back compressor and as
such it behaves quite similar to the alpha compressor:
While it provides full control over every aspect of the
compression process, the compression itself is rather
on the gentle and gluing side.
The xpressor 500 is the perfect buss compressor, oer-
ing two stereo linked channels and the perfect feature
set to handle even the most complex signals: A mix
stage for onboard parallel compression, a sidechain
lter for dealing with the low frequencies, and elysias
unique gain reduction limiter for a perfect control on
the complete compression process.
Of course, the xpressor can also be used for process-
ing a single mono signal as well, and its straight for-
ward yet substantial feature set makes it one of the
most exible compressors on the planet.

Summary of content (3 pages)